Mj. Jones et M. Singh, Long-term yield patterns in barley-based cropping systems in Northern Syria. 3. Barley monocropping, J AGR SCI, 135, 2000, pp. 251-259
Results from monocropped barley treatments in long-term rotation (RTN) and
continuous barley (CB) trials at two sites were examined for fertilizer eff
ects on yield means and long-term yield trends. In RTN trials, mean respons
es to fertilizer (N:P2O5) applied annually at rates of 20:60 at the drier a
nd 40:60 at the wetter site were almost double those from biennial applicat
ion, confirming the need for annual fertilization in monocropped barley sys
tems. In CB trials, with N and P applied annually in nine factorial combina
tions, at rates up to 120:90, responses to each nutrient were curvilinear a
nd dependent on the presence of the other nutrient. Trend analysis showed a
decline in grain yields over time where NP fertilizer had not been applied
or applied only at low annual rates (< 60:45 or < 60:90, according to site
); but straw yields, at worst, remained approximately stable in the absence
of fertilizer and generally increased strongly with higher NP rates. Uncer
tainties in the interpretation of trend-analysis results indicate the need
for methodology improvements, to include (i) additional single-value parame
ters of the growth environment, to improve the model's ability to account f
or seasonal variability, and (ii) a more flexible, non-linear function for
time.
It was concluded that barley monocropping is not necessarily non-sustainabl
e in the medium term: provided adequate annual fertilization is maintained;
but risks of pest or disease build-up, in addition to the superiority of l
egume-barley systems in biomass and crude protein output demonstrated in pr
eceding papers, undoubtedly favour the introduction of some forage legumes
into long-term barley sequences. The most practicable (and acceptable) syst
ems may well be ones in which continuous barley is interrupted by a legume,
or even a bare fallow, every third or fourth year. Above all, farmers shou
ld be helped to experiment with different forage legumes, barley-legume seq
uences, and modes of legume harvest, to optimize outputs in relation to the
ir evolving and individual enterprise needs.