Long-term yield patterns in barley-based cropping systems in Northern Syria. 3. Barley monocropping

Citation
Mj. Jones et M. Singh, Long-term yield patterns in barley-based cropping systems in Northern Syria. 3. Barley monocropping, J AGR SCI, 135, 2000, pp. 251-259
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00218596 → ACNP
Volume
135
Year of publication
2000
Part
3
Pages
251 - 259
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8596(200011)135:<251:LYPIBC>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Results from monocropped barley treatments in long-term rotation (RTN) and continuous barley (CB) trials at two sites were examined for fertilizer eff ects on yield means and long-term yield trends. In RTN trials, mean respons es to fertilizer (N:P2O5) applied annually at rates of 20:60 at the drier a nd 40:60 at the wetter site were almost double those from biennial applicat ion, confirming the need for annual fertilization in monocropped barley sys tems. In CB trials, with N and P applied annually in nine factorial combina tions, at rates up to 120:90, responses to each nutrient were curvilinear a nd dependent on the presence of the other nutrient. Trend analysis showed a decline in grain yields over time where NP fertilizer had not been applied or applied only at low annual rates (< 60:45 or < 60:90, according to site ); but straw yields, at worst, remained approximately stable in the absence of fertilizer and generally increased strongly with higher NP rates. Uncer tainties in the interpretation of trend-analysis results indicate the need for methodology improvements, to include (i) additional single-value parame ters of the growth environment, to improve the model's ability to account f or seasonal variability, and (ii) a more flexible, non-linear function for time. It was concluded that barley monocropping is not necessarily non-sustainabl e in the medium term: provided adequate annual fertilization is maintained; but risks of pest or disease build-up, in addition to the superiority of l egume-barley systems in biomass and crude protein output demonstrated in pr eceding papers, undoubtedly favour the introduction of some forage legumes into long-term barley sequences. The most practicable (and acceptable) syst ems may well be ones in which continuous barley is interrupted by a legume, or even a bare fallow, every third or fourth year. Above all, farmers shou ld be helped to experiment with different forage legumes, barley-legume seq uences, and modes of legume harvest, to optimize outputs in relation to the ir evolving and individual enterprise needs.