Aim: This study compared the performance of three Campylobacter enrichment
broths: Bolton broth (BB), Campylobacter Enrichment broth (CEB) and Preston
broth (PB).
Methods and Results: Pure cultures of target and competitor organisms, and
naturally-contaminated food samples, were used to establish the performance
of these media. In pure culture the PB supported the growth of the greates
t number of strains of Campylobacter spp. but failed to inhibit some compet
itor organisms. The CEB showed the opposite result, inhibiting all 15 compe
titor organisms used but failing to support the growth of five Campylobacte
r strains. By comparison, BB showed the best compromise between inhibition
of competitors and growth of Campylobacter.
Conclusions: Plates inoculated with BB and CEB food enrichments resulted in
more Campylobacter growth than those inoculated with PB, which supported s
ignificantly less typical growth (P less than or equal to 0.001). The most
common competitor organism isolated from PB was Escherichia coli, and Pseud
omonas spp. were frequently isolated from BB and CEB. Both BB and CEB were
better than PB for the isolation of Campylobacter from naturally-contaminat
ed foods, although BB yielded more confirmed Campylobacter growth than CEB.
Significance and Impact of the Study: This study highlighted differences in
performance of media used to isolate Campylobacter spp. from foods.