Background: Open reduction and internal fixation has been recommended as th
e treatment for most unstable injuries of the Lisfranc (tarsometatarsal) jo
int. It has been thought that purely ligamentous injuries have a poor outco
me despite such surgical management.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent open
reduction and screw fixation of a Lisfranc injury in a seven-year period. A
mong ninety-two adults treated for that injury, forty-eight patients with f
orty-eight injuries were followed for an average of fifty-two months (range
, thirteen to 114 months). Fifteen injuries were purely ligamentous, and th
irty-three were combined ligamentous and osseous. Patient outcome was asses
sed with use of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) mid
foot score and the long-form Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) scor
e.
Results: The average AOFAS midfoot score was 77 points (on a scale of 0 to
100 points with 100 points indicating an excellent outcome), with patients
losing points for mild pain, decreased recreational function, and orthotic
requirements. The average MFA score was 19 points (on a scale of 0 to 100 p
oints, with 0 points indicating an excellent outcome), with patients losing
points because of problems with "leisure activities" and difficulties with
"life changes and feelings due to the injury." Twelve patients (25 percent
) had posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the tarsometatarsal joints, and six o
f them required arthrodesis. The major determinant of a good result was ana
tomical reduction (p = 0.05). The subgroup of patients with purely ligament
ous injury showed a trend toward poorer outcomes despite anatomical reducti
on and screw fixation.
Conclusions: Our results support the concept that stable anatomical reducti
on of fracture-dislocations of the Lisfranc joint leads to the best long-te
rm outcomes as patients so treated have less arthritis as well as better AO
FAS midfoot scores.