Postoperative analgesia by intraarticular and epidural neostigmine following knee surgery

Citation
Gr. Lauretti et al., Postoperative analgesia by intraarticular and epidural neostigmine following knee surgery, J CLIN ANES, 12(6), 2000, pp. 444-448
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
ISSN journal
09528180 → ACNP
Volume
12
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
444 - 448
Database
ISI
SICI code
0952-8180(200009)12:6<444:PABIAE>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Study Objectives: To define the analgesic efficacy, and to identify a possi ble site of action, of epidural and intraarticular neostigmine. Design: Randomized analgesia, teaching hospital. Patients: 58 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing knee surgery. Interventions: All patients were premedicated with 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg intrav enous midazolam and received combined epidural/intrathecal technique. Intra thecal anesthesia consisted of 20 mg bupivacaine. A 10 ml. epidural and int raarticular injection was administered to all patients; this consisted of e ither the study drug or normal saline. Postoperatively, pain was assessed u sing the 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and intramuscular (IM) 75 mg dicl ofenac was available at patient request. The control group (CG) received bo th epidural and intraarticular saline. The 1 mug/kg epidural group (1 mug/k g EG) received epidural neostigmine and intraarticular saline. The 1 mug/kg intraarticular group (1 mug/kg AG) received epidural saline and intraartic ular neostigmine. Finally, the 500 mug intraarticular group (500 mug AG) re ceived epidural saline and intraarticular neostigmine. Measurements and Main Results: 56 patients were evaluated. Groups were demo graphically the same and did not differ in intraoperative characteristics. The VAS score at first rescue analgesic and the incidence of adverse effect s were similar among groups (p < 0.05). The time (min) to first rescue anal gesic was shorter for both the CG (228 +/- 54) and 1 <mu>g/kg AG (251 +/- 8 7) groups compared to the 1 mug/kg EG (333 +/- 78) and 500 mug Ag (335 +/- 111) groups (p < 0.05). The analgesic consumption (number of IM diclofenac injections (mean [ 25(th) - 75(th) percentile]) in 24 hours was higher in t he CG group than both the 1 <mu>g/kg EG and 500 mug AG groups (p < 0.05). T he overall 24-hour pain VAS score (cm) was higher in the CG group than in t he 1 <mu>g/kg EG (p < 0.05) group. Conclusion: Although peripheral neostigmine 1 <mu>g/kg did not result in po stoperative analgesia, the same dose applied epidurally resulted in over 5 hours of analgesia, similar to a fivefold dose applied peripherally. The re sults suggest that epidural neostigmine has a greater analgesic efficacy th an peripherally applied neostigmine. (C) 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc.