Dr. Boughner et al., The pericardial bioprosthesis: Altered tissue shear properties following glutaraldehyde fixation, J HEART V D, 9(6), 2000, pp. 752-760
Background and nim of the study: Glutaraldehydefixed bovine pericardial tis
sue used in the construction of valvular bioprostheses undergoes repeated b
ending stress during the cardiac cycle. To bend smoothly, internal tissue s
hearing is required. The effect of glutaraldehyde fixation on internal shea
r properties of this material was examined.
Methods: Pericardium from each of 12 bovine hearts was cut into two pieces;
one piece was retained as fresh tissue, the other was glutaraldehyde-fixed
. Circular samples were then mounted and installed in a shear testing appar
atus. For each sample, the shear stress versus shear strain characteristics
were measured in circumferential and radial directions at strain rates of
1.0, 0.1 and 0.02 s(-1) while immersed in a 20 degreesC bath; similar measu
rements were made on six fresh and six fixed samples at 37 degreesC. In add
ition, the stress relaxation properties were measured by holding the tissue
at maximum shear for 100 s after each of the three shear deformations, and
recording force generated with time.
Results: The shear stress-strain test on fresh tissue (n = 12) showed non-l
inear behavior at the three shear rates. The shear modulus for fresh tissue
increased from <1.0 kPa to 5 kPa at a shear strain approaching 1.0, and re
sults were identical in radial or circumferential directions. For glutarald
ehyde-fixed pericardium (n = 12), shear modulus increased promptly to 15-20
kPa at a strain of 0.5 and did not vary with strain rate. Shear relaxation
was similar in fresh and fixed tissue.
Conclusion: Fresh pericardium sheared easily at low shear stresses, with mi
nimal resistance developing until the shear strain exceeded 0.5, while glut
araldehyde-fixed tissue displayed a marked resistance to shearing, with an
immediate rise in shear stress at low strain. No differences were detected
in shear properties between radial and circumferential directions. Such mar
ked tissue stiffening may be a factor in collagen fiber disruption, leading
to bioprosthetic heart valve failure.