N. Lane, The management implications of women's employment disadvantage in a female-dominated profession: A study of NHS nursing, J MANAG STU, 37(5), 2000, pp. 705-731
Current explanations of gender inequality in paid employment fall into two
broad groups. Firstly, there are theorists who argue that the actions and s
trategies of managers maintain and perpetuate unequal outcomes for women in
the labour market. Secondly, there are theorists who argue that women's lo
wer commitment to work determines their job choices and outcomes. A survey
of 643 qualified female NHS nurses examines both approaches. We argue that
recognizing not only the existence of gender-based disadvantage but also it
s sources are important in devising effective managerial policies and initi
atives. Also, conventionally less attention has been given to patterns of i
ndividual disadvantage for employees within workforces dominated by members
of the same gender. Employment disadvantage is shown to exist in the singl
e gender workforce, as in the more general case, but its operation is subtl
er and more difficult for managers to detect. This suggests a number of imp
ortant management implications: a clear need for diagnosing potential patte
rns of disadvantage which may be relatively covert; the need to recognize t
he imperative for monitoring employment equity beyond regulatory compliance
; the need for the implementation of effective strategy; and managers' need
to evaluate the adequacy of not simply equal opportunities policies, but t
he broader issue of long-term career planning.