Gaseous CF3+ interchanges F+ for O with simple carbonyl compounds. CF3+ rea
cts with propionaldehyde in the gas phase to produce (CH3)(2)CF+ via two co
mpeting pathways. Starting with 1-C-13-propionaldehyde, the major pathway (
80%) produces (CH3)(2)CF+ with the carbon label in one of the methyl groups
. The minor pathway (20%) produces (CH3)(2)CF+ with the carbon label in the
central position. The relative proportions of these two pathways are measu
red by F-19 NMC analysis of the neutral CH3CF=CH2 produced by deprotonation
of (CH3)(2)CF+ at <10(-3) Torr in an electron bombardment flow (EBFlow) re
actor. Formation of alkene in which carbon is directly bonded to fluorine m
eans that (in the minor product, at least) an F+ for O transposition occurs
via adduct formation followed by 1,3-atom transfer and then isomerization
of CH3CH2CNF+ to the more stable (CH3)(2)CF+. Use of CF4 as a chemical ioni
zation (CI) reagent gas leads to CF3+ adduct ions for a variety of ketones,
in addition to isoelectronic transposition of F+ for O, Metastable ion dec
ompositions of the adduct ions yield the metathesis products. Decomposition
s of fluorocycloalkyl cations Termed in this manner give evidence for the s
ame kinds of rearrangements as take place in CH3CH2CHF+. Density functional
calculations confirm that F+ for O metathesis takes place via addition of
CF3+ to the carbonyl oxygen followed by transposition via a four-member cyc
lic transition state. A computational survey of the effects of different su
bstituents in a series of aldehydes and acyclic ketones reveals no systemat
ic variation of the energy of the transition state as a function of thermoc
hemistry, but the Hammond postulate does appear to be obeyed in terms of pr
ogress along the reaction coordinate. Bond lengths corresponding to the cen
tral barrier correlate with overall thermochemistry of the F+ for O interch
ange, but in a sense opposite to what might have been expected: the transit
ion state becomes more product-like as the metathesis becomes increasingly
exothermic. This reversal of the naive interpretation of the Hammond postul
ate is accounted for by the relative positions of the potential energy well
s that precede and follow the central barrier.