S. Schmidt et H. Walach, Electrodermal activity (EDA) - State-of-the-art measurement and techniquesfor parapsychological purposes, J PARAPSYCH, 64(2), 2000, pp. 139-163
In most of the direct mental interactions with living systems (DMILS)/Remot
e Staring studies, electrodermal activity (EDA) is the only dependent varia
ble. Therefore the quality of EDA recording is crucial. This is the reason
why we studied EDA-related literature and contacted some of the leading psy
chophysiological labs in Germany to debate critical topics of the EDA measu
rement. We also checked the Methods section of all studies using EDA data p
ublished from 1995 to 1999 in the leading psychophysiological journals. In
addition, we surveyed all DMILS/Remote Staring publications using EDA to fi
nd out whether parapsychologists adhere to these standards. In the first pa
rt of our paper we outline a current state-of-the-art EDA methodology. We a
lso address various technical problems and describe sources for potential a
rtifacts. In the second part we compare 24 DMILS/Remote Staring with a samp
le of 39 recent psychophysiological studies published in Psychophysiology a
nd International Journal of Psychophysiology. The analysis reveals that par
apsychologists do not meet the current standards. There is not even one stu
dy conducted by parapsychologists which refers to psychophysiology's measur
ement standards published in 1981. Therefore, DMILS/Remote Staring data may
either contain artifacts, or, on the other hand, may not detect the suppos
ed effects. Although there is an ongoing trend of finding irregularities in
EDA data of DMILS/Remote Staring experiments that can be related to differ
ent intentional conditions, there have not been any efforts to understand t
he results of EDA experiments or to address the origin of the irregularitie
s in detail.