As. Dumont et al., Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and bone metabolism in spinal fusion surgery - A pharmacological quandary, J PHARM TOX, 43(1), 2000, pp. 31-39
Citations number
81
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS
The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is ubiquitous in c
ontemporary medical practice and these agents are efficacious in a number o
f clinical contexts. In particular, NSAIDs have proven to be highly effecti
ve adjuncts in the amelioration of postoperative pain in the subset of pati
ents undergoing spinal surgery requiring fusion. NSAIDs act through inhibit
ion of cyclooxygenase enzymes and therefore diminish prostaglandin producti
on. However, prostaglandins are intimately involved in the modulation of bo
ne metabolism and the balance of data, from both clinical and I;laboratory
contexts, indicate that prostaglandins preferentially favor bone anabolism.
Most recently, limited emerging evidence suggests that NSAID administratio
n in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery may increase nonunion rates,
which in turn, has important ramifications to the patient, their family an
d the entire medical system. Hence, disparate views have evolved regarding
the use of NSAIDs in postoperative pain control in patients undergoing spin
al surgery requiring fusion. NSAIDs have proven efficacy in the management
of postoperative pain in these patients, however, this must be weighed agai
nst the risk of nonunion and its associated consequences. In this review, t
he role of prostaglandins in bone metabolism, the pharmacology of NSAIDs an
d the modulation of bone metabolism by NSAIDs are discussed. Additionally,
the current evidence examining the use of NSAIDs in spinal surgery is prese
nted. As rates of spinal surgery continue to rise, it is imperative that th
e apparent pharmacological quandary surrounding the administration of NSAID
s in patients undergoing spinal surgery requiring fusion be addressed, both
to guide present clinical practice and to outline further directions for i
nvestigation. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.