S. Edelman et al., Group interventions with cancer patients: Efficacy of psychoeducational versus supportive groups, J PSYCH ONC, 18(3), 2000, pp. 67-85
Cancer support groups have become increasingly available to patients over t
he last two decades. Although the various patient groups differ in their ph
ilosophy, membership, and aims, the majority can be categorized as predomin
antly "supportive" or "psychoeducational" in their approach. To date, there
is little evidence regarding the relative benefits of the two types of gro
up in improving patients' psychological outcomes. This article presents a c
ritical review of the evidence for the relative efficacy of the two approac
hes. A search of the literature using CD-ROM databases identified 15 studie
s of acceptable design that quantitatively evaluated psychological outcomes
of one or both types of group intervention. Although some findings have be
en inconsistent, the majority of evidence suggests that patients who attend
psychoeducational groups experience greater benefits than do those who att
end purely supportive groups. Further well-designed research in this area i
s needed to identify specific patient cohorts that are most likely to benef
it from each approach.