SEASONAL VARIABILITY IN THE SURFACE CURRENTS OF THE EQUATORIAL PACIFIC

Citation
G. Reverdin et al., SEASONAL VARIABILITY IN THE SURFACE CURRENTS OF THE EQUATORIAL PACIFIC, J GEO RES-O, 99(C10), 1994, pp. 20323-20344
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Oceanografhy
Journal title
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
ISSN journal
21699275 → ACNP
Volume
99
Issue
C10
Year of publication
1994
Pages
20323 - 20344
Database
ISI
SICI code
2169-9275(1994)99:C10<20323:SVITSC>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Buoy drifts and current meter records between January 1987 and April 1 992 are used to investigate the seasonal variability of the equatorial Pacific Ocean currents at a depth of 15 m. The buoy drifts and curren t meter data are well correlated, and their differences are small, alt hough slightly larger currents may be given by the buoy drifts. The se asonal cycle in the currents is analyzed between 20-degrees-N and 20-d egrees-S on a 1-degree-x5-degrees grid using a function-fitting algori thm which somewhat smoothes the zonal structure but retains the meridi onal structure. The analysis captures a large, zonally coherent season al variability of the currents within 15-degrees of the equator, which significantly exceeds the estimated errors that originate from the li mited sampling of the interannual, intraseasonal, and higher-frequency fluctuations of the currents. Many features of the new climatology ar e shared with other analyses of the surface currents in the equatorial Pacific, particularly the timing of the seasonal cycle of the main cu rrents. There are, however, differences in the current velocities that are illustrated by a comparison with the ship drift data, which are a nalyzed here with the same spatial resolution. The analysis of the shi p drifts presents larger meridional scales which are probably the resu lt of the spatial smoothing involved in estimating a ship drift. The s hip drifts are noticeably downwind of the 15-m currents. At the equato r, they are also more westward than in the analysis of the 15-m curren ts between November and March near the date line and January and July in the eastern Pacific which at least partially results from differenc es in the climatic conditions sampled in the two data sets.