Poor compliance with postmolar surveillance and treatment protocols by indigent women

Citation
Ls. Massad et al., Poor compliance with postmolar surveillance and treatment protocols by indigent women, OBSTET GYN, 96(6), 2000, pp. 940-944
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00297844 → ACNP
Volume
96
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
940 - 944
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-7844(200012)96:6<940:PCWPSA>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Objective: To estimate compliance by indigent women with surveillance proto cols after molar pregnancy. Methods: Women whose molar pregnancies were evacuated at an urban, public h ospital were advised to return weekly either until hCG levels decreased bel ow 5 mIU/mL, then monthly for 6 months, or until diagnosis and treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease, then monthly for 12 months. Hormone tes ting was by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Statistical analysis was by chi (2) tests. Results: Of 51 women identified, 11 (22%) developed trophoblastic disease. All achieved remission after chemotherapy. Five (45%) of these 11 missed at least one treatment, seven (64%) missed at least one postremission visit, and none was fully compliant with protocols. Five (13%) of the 40 remaining women were lost to follow-up before remission. Seven (18%) of the 40 women who did not receive chemotherapy complied fully with protocols, whereas fi ve (13%) were lost to follow-up before remission, and 16 (40%) were lost be fore completing 6 months of follow-up. Only 15 (29%) of the 51 women comple ted surveillance without gestational trophoblastic disease or pregnancy. Si x women conceived, and injectable medroxyprogesterone acetate was associate d with a lower pregnancy rate (zero of 25 compared with six of 26 (23%), P <.01). Conclusion: Most indigent women failed to comply with postmolar surveillanc e, although most achieved remission. Injectable medroxyprogesterone acetate is recommended for postmolar contraception in this population. (Obstet Gyn ecol 2000;96:940-4. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and G ynecologists.).