It has been suggested that positive biomass responses of grassland to eleva
ted CO2 result from moisture savings in the soil as opposed to direct photo
synthetic stimulation. In order to test this hypothesis for calcareous gras
sland we subjected experimental communities consisting of two important gra
minoid components of such grasslands (Carex flacca and Bromus erectus) on n
atural substrate to a fully factorial treatment of ambient (360 ppm) and el
evated (600 ppm) CO2 concentration and four irrigation regimes (9 mm, 18 mm
, 27 mm and 36 mm week(-1)). Biomass stimulation under elevated CO2 was hig
her the lower the irrigation rate was. Superimposed on the effects of irrig
ation on soil moisture, elevated CO2-induced higher soil water contents in
all irrigation treatments via reduced plant water consumption (on average o
ne-third lower stomatal conductance). This led to eight different soil mois
ture regimes instead of the intended four. When growth parameters were plot
ted against the effective soil water content rather than irrigation treatme
nt, the "pure" CO2 effect on total biomass and other traits became much sma
ller and completely disappeared for biomass per tiller, leaf area per groun
d area, leaf mass fraction (LMF) and root mass fraction (RMF). We conclude
that the CO2 response observed in this graminoid system consisted of a smal
l primary CO2 effect and a large secondary, CO2-induced, soil moisture effe
ct. Thus, it is difficult to use responses to CO2 from experiments in which
CO2-induced soil moisture savings occur to predict CO2 effects as long as
future soil moisture regimes are not defined. We suggest that direct and in
direct (moisture driven) CO2 effects should be strictly separated, which re
quires data to be tested against soil moisture.