Electoral formulas and campaign practices in some nations encourage voters
to consider the personal qualifications of candidates for legislative offic
e, whereas individuating information about candidates is unavailable to vot
ers in other nations. Where electoral rules and elite behavior foster the p
ersonal vote, the personal vote nourishes. However, it is unclear why voter
s respond to personal information about candidates. We test two competing h
ypotheses: that the personal vote reflects a general human tendency to atte
nd to information regarding individuals' personal qualifications; and that
the personal vote is an acquired behavior that emerges after voters are soc
ialized to attend to personal information about candidates. We use counterf
actual simulations to test these hypotheses. Specifically, we conduct labor
atory experiments in which subjects drawn from Mexico and Venezuela-nations
in which electoral rules ensure that the personal vote does not flourish-a
re provided the opportunity to consider candidates' personal qualifications
. Results are consistent with the hypothesis that the personal vote stems f
rom a general tendency in human decision making.