Rationale: Dopamine D-2, receptors are postulated to play an important role
in modulating the reinforcing effects of abused drugs including ethanol. O
bjectives: This experiment examined operant ethanol self-administration in
dopamine D2 receptor knockout (KO) mice and wild-type (WT) mice using a con
tinuous access procedure. Methods: Adult male KO and WT mice were trained i
n 30-min sessions to perform a lever press response for access to 10% v/v e
thanol. After training, the mice were placed in test chambers on a continuo
us (23 h/day) basis with access to food tone lever press, i.e., FR1), 10% v
/v ethanol (four lever presses, i.e., FR4), and water from a sipper tube (p
hase 1). After 30 consecutive sessions, response patterns were determined f
ur 0, 5, 10, 20 and 30% v/v ethanol (phase 2). Saccharin (0.2% w/v) was sub
sequently added to the ethanol mixture and responding was examined for 0, 5
, 10 and 20% ethanol (phase 3). Results: During phase 1, WT mice displayed
higher ethanol-lever responding compared to KO mice. Food lever responding
and water intake was the same in both genotypes. During phase 2, WT mice di
splayed concentration-dependent ethanol lever responding, whereas KO mice r
esponded at low rates regardless of ethanol concentration. WT mice also res
ponded more for food compared to KO mice. Each genotype showed similar wate
r intakes except at the 20% ethanol concentration, where WT mice had lower
intakes. During phase 3, WT mice continued to show higher responding for al
l concentrations including saccharin alone. WT mice also continued to respo
nd more for food compared to KO mice, but drank less water. In each phase,
WT mice displayed episodic (bout) responding on the ethanol lever. KO mice
did not respond for ethanol in bouts. Conclusions: Reduced responding in th
e KO mice for several reinforcers including ethanol indicates a more genera
l role for dopamine D-2 receptors in motivated responding rather than a spe
cific role in ethanol reinforcement.