The safety and efficacy of short course (5-day) moxifloxacin vs. azithromycin in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

Citation
Ca. Deabate et al., The safety and efficacy of short course (5-day) moxifloxacin vs. azithromycin in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, RESP MED, 94(11), 2000, pp. 1029-1037
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","da verificare
Journal title
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
09546111 → ACNP
Volume
94
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1029 - 1037
Database
ISI
SICI code
0954-6111(200011)94:11<1029:TSAEOS>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Chronic bronchitis is common among adults and infectious exacerbations cont ribute considerably to morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the saf ety and efficacy of moxifloxacin to azithromycin for the treatment of patie nts with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) of suspected bact erial origin. Between October 1998 and April 1999, 567 patients with AECB were enrolled a t 37 centers across the United States and Canada of which 280 (49%) had acu te bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (i.e. pretherapy pathogen). Patients were randomized to either oral moxifloxacin 400 mg administered on ce daily for 5 days or azithromycin for 5 days (500 mg qd x 1, then 250 mg qd x 4). For the purpose of study blinding, all patients received encapsula ted tablets. The main outcome measure was clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (1 4-21 days post-therapy). Secondary measures included bacteriologic response and a time-course of bacteriological eradication (one center only). Three patient populations were analysed for efficacy: clinically-valid, microbiol ogically-valid (i.e. those with a pretherapy pathogen), and intent-to-treat (i.e. received at least one dose of study drug). For the efficacy-valid group, clinical response at the test-of-cure visit w as 88% for patients in each treatment group. In 237 microbiologically-valid patients, corresponding clinical resolution rates were 88% for 5-day moxif loxacin vs. 86% for 5-day azithromycin. Bacteriological eradication rates a t the end of therapy were 95% for 5-day moxifloxacin and 94% for the azithr omycin group. Corresponding eradication rates at the test-of-cure visit wer e 89% and 86%, respectively. Of note, eradication rates at test-of-cure for Haem. philos influenzae and H. parainfluenzae for moxifloxacin were 97% an d 88% compared to 83% and 62% respectively for azithromycin. Among 567 inte nt-to-treat patients (283 moxifloxacin and 284 azithromycin), drug-related events were reported for 22% and 17%, respectively. Diarrhea and nausea wer e the most common drug-related events reported in each treatment group. Moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily for 5 days was found to be clinically and ba cteriologically equivalent to 5-day azithromycin for the treatment of AECB of proven bacterial etiology. Given its excellent in-vitro activity, especi ally against antibiotic-resistant respiratory pathogens, and its acceptable safety profile, moxifloxacin should be considered an effective alternative therapy for patients with AECB of suspected bacterial origin.