The safety and efficacy of short course (5-day) moxifloxacin vs. azithromycin in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis
Ca. Deabate et al., The safety and efficacy of short course (5-day) moxifloxacin vs. azithromycin in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, RESP MED, 94(11), 2000, pp. 1029-1037
Chronic bronchitis is common among adults and infectious exacerbations cont
ribute considerably to morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the saf
ety and efficacy of moxifloxacin to azithromycin for the treatment of patie
nts with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) of suspected bact
erial origin.
Between October 1998 and April 1999, 567 patients with AECB were enrolled a
t 37 centers across the United States and Canada of which 280 (49%) had acu
te bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (i.e. pretherapy pathogen).
Patients were randomized to either oral moxifloxacin 400 mg administered on
ce daily for 5 days or azithromycin for 5 days (500 mg qd x 1, then 250 mg
qd x 4). For the purpose of study blinding, all patients received encapsula
ted tablets.
The main outcome measure was clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (1
4-21 days post-therapy). Secondary measures included bacteriologic response
and a time-course of bacteriological eradication (one center only). Three
patient populations were analysed for efficacy: clinically-valid, microbiol
ogically-valid (i.e. those with a pretherapy pathogen), and intent-to-treat
(i.e. received at least one dose of study drug).
For the efficacy-valid group, clinical response at the test-of-cure visit w
as 88% for patients in each treatment group. In 237 microbiologically-valid
patients, corresponding clinical resolution rates were 88% for 5-day moxif
loxacin vs. 86% for 5-day azithromycin. Bacteriological eradication rates a
t the end of therapy were 95% for 5-day moxifloxacin and 94% for the azithr
omycin group. Corresponding eradication rates at the test-of-cure visit wer
e 89% and 86%, respectively. Of note, eradication rates at test-of-cure for
Haem. philos influenzae and H. parainfluenzae for moxifloxacin were 97% an
d 88% compared to 83% and 62% respectively for azithromycin. Among 567 inte
nt-to-treat patients (283 moxifloxacin and 284 azithromycin), drug-related
events were reported for 22% and 17%, respectively. Diarrhea and nausea wer
e the most common drug-related events reported in each treatment group.
Moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily for 5 days was found to be clinically and ba
cteriologically equivalent to 5-day azithromycin for the treatment of AECB
of proven bacterial etiology. Given its excellent in-vitro activity, especi
ally against antibiotic-resistant respiratory pathogens, and its acceptable
safety profile, moxifloxacin should be considered an effective alternative
therapy for patients with AECB of suspected bacterial origin.