The literatures on globalization and regionalization on the one hand, and o
n the institutional distinctiveness of national capitalisms on the other, s
eem to pull in very different directions. Nonetheless, an increasing number
of international and comparative political economists sensitive to the ins
titutional and cultural variability of contemporary capitalism identify ten
dencies towards convergence-often towards an Angle-US model of deregulated
neoliberal capitalism. In this article I critically review the literature o
n convergence, difference and divergence in the global political economy, d
ifferentiating between neoclassical and institutionalist perspectives. Resi
sting arguments which posit a natural selection process initiated by untram
melled free market competition and free capital mobility, I identify the co
ntingent, political and frequently coercive nature of the convergence proce
ss. This is illustrated through a discussion of regional selection mechanis
ms in the context of European Monetary Union and the East Asian financial c
risis. In so far as evolutionary selection mechanisms can be identified in
the European context, selecting for a more residual social model, these are
more a product of the contingent process of European economic integration
than they are a necessary consequence of globalization. Moreover, in so far
as similarly convergent processes can be identified in contemporary East A
sia, they are less a product of globalization than of the 'predatory neolib
eralism' of a beleagured Washington Consensus.