Comparison of bolus and infusion of the ultrasound contrast agent Levovistfur colour Doppler ultrasound of renal arteries

Citation
T. Albrecht et al., Comparison of bolus and infusion of the ultrasound contrast agent Levovistfur colour Doppler ultrasound of renal arteries, ROFO-F RONT, 172(10), 2000, pp. 824-829
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN
ISSN journal
14389029 → ACNP
Volume
172
Issue
10
Year of publication
2000
Pages
824 - 829
Database
ISI
SICI code
1438-9029(200010)172:10<824:COBAIO>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate if the duration of Doppler enhancement of the ultra sound contrast agent Levovist can be prolonged by continuous infusion compa red to bolus injections in patients. Methods: 12 patients with suspected re nal artery stenosis were included. Each patient received 1 or 2 bolus injec tions of 4 g each and a "fast" infusion of 3 ml/min (average dose: 7 g) of Levovist. in 8 patients an additional "slow" infusion of 1 ml/min (average dose 4.2 g) was given. The duration of "strong" Doppler signal enhancement and the visualization of vessels were compared. Results: The duration of st rong enhancement was substantially prolonged by the slow infusion (bolus 6: 21 min, fast infusion: 8:57 min, slow infusion: 15:12 min, p < 0.001). The dose effectiveness (duration of strong enhancement per 1 g Levovist) was ma rkedly improved from 0:57 min (bolus) to 3:36 min (slow infusion). Visualis ation of the renal arteries was more complete with the slow infusion. Concl usion: Levovist infusions at 1 ml/min are superior to bolus injections in t he assessment of renal arteries. They prolong the enhancement, make more ef ficient use of a given dose of contrast material and thus allow additional clinically relevant information to be obtained at reduced cost.