Telophase enucleation has been proven to be an efficient method for prepari
ng recipient cytoplasts in bovine embryonic nuclear transfer (2, 11). This
research was designed to study in vitro development of bovine oocytes conta
ining transferred somatic cell nuclei, reconstructed by using enucleated in
vitro-matured oocytes 32 h of age at telophase Il stage as recipient cytop
lasts, compared with those 24 h of age at metaphase II stage. Two protocols
for donor cell injection were adopted, i.e., subzonal injection (SUZI) and
intracytoplasmic injection (ICI). Bovine oviduct epithelial cells (BOECs)
and bovine cumulus cells (BCCs) from an adult cow were used as nuclear dono
rs for these experiments. In SUZI groups, the fusion rate of donor cells, b
oth BOECs and BCCs, with MII enucleated oocytes were higher than those with
TII enucleated oocytes (54% vs. 41% and 53% vs. 39%, respectively; P < 0.0
5), but the development rates to morula plus blastocyst stage in MII groups
were lower than those in TII groups (22% vs. 39% and 21% vs. 41%, respecti
vely; P < 0.05). In ICI groups, about 26% of enucleated MII oocytes injecte
d with BOECs or BCCs cleaved and only small parts of them developed to blas
tocyst stage (4% and 3%, respectively; P > 0.05). When BOECs or BCCs were i
ntracytoplasmically injected into oocytes enucleated at TII stage, no blast
ocyst was formed in either donor cell group and no cleavage occurred in BOE
C group. Our data demonstrated that telophase enucleation is beneficial to
early embryo development when bovine somatic nuclei are transferred by subz
onal injection. However, ii is harmful when donor cells are directly inject
ed into the cytoplast of the enucleated oocytes. (C) 2000 by Elsevier Scien
ce Inc.