Ultrasonography of the urogenital tract in elephants (Loxodonta africana and Elephas maximus): An important tool for assessing male reproductive function
Tb. Hildebrandt et al., Ultrasonography of the urogenital tract in elephants (Loxodonta africana and Elephas maximus): An important tool for assessing male reproductive function, ZOO BIOL, 19(5), 2000, pp. 333-345
The success rate of captive elephant breeding programs worldwide is poor. A
long with undiagnosed reproductive disorders in females and fatal diseases
such as the newly discovered herpesvirus infection, male infertility now is
considered a major contributing factor in the failure to maintain self-sus
taining captive populations. To address questions related to male reproduct
ive dysfunction, approximately 309 ultrasonographic assessments combined wi
th semen collection were performed in captive (n = 10) and wild (n = 4) Afr
ican (Loxodonta africana) and captive (n = 61) Asian (Elephas maximus) elep
hants. Bulls ranged from 4 to 50 years of age and were examined at 9 instit
utions in North America, 13 in Europe, 2 in Africa, and 7 in Asia. About ha
lf of the reproductive assessments were performed in protected contact situ
ations with elephants handled in a restraint device, and half involved asse
ssments of trained Asian bulls managed in free contact. Four wild African a
nd two Asian elephant bulls were evaluated after receiving general anesthes
ia. Transrectal ultrasound was used to characterize the morphology and func
tionality of the entire urogenital tract, including the testes and accessor
y sex organs. Bulls were categorized on the basis of breeding status (breed
ers vs. non-breeders) and social history (i.e., type of interaction with co
nspecifics and keepers). Most of the bulls were non-breeders (designated Ty
pes I-V). Type I (n = 3 African, 6 Asian) and Type V (n = 1 Asian) were imm
ature and castrate, respectively. On the basis of keeper evaluations, Type
II bulls (n = 2, 4) were subordinate to older cows and keepers, whereas Typ
e LII bulls (n = 4, 28) were dominated by other bulls. Type TV (n = 1, 8) w
ere older bulls of unknown history that exhibited numerous testicular patho
logies resulting in poor semen quality. Non-breeding bulls included those t
hat were exposed to females, but failed to breed, as well as these that had
no opportunities to breed. Type VI individuals (n = 4, 14) were proven bre
eders. The percentage of observable reproductive tract pathology in adult m
ales was remarkably low (14%), even in older bulls. However, apparent infer
tility of non-organic cause (i.e., not due to specific anatomical abnormali
ties) in these otherwise healthy bulls was high (32%). Semen quality varied
markedly in ejaculates collected from the same bull, as well as from diffe
rent bulls. In conclusion, although many of these bulls could serve as seme
n donors for natural mating or artificial insemination, the inconsistent pr
oduction of good-quality ejaculates raises questions as to the reliability
of these individuals to participate in breeding programs. The apparent inhi
bitory effect of suppressive social interactions on reproductive potential
also needs to be investigated. Ultrasound examinations combined with semen
collection should be conducted periodically to estimate the reproductive va
lue of each bull and determine whether altered management strategies are ne
eded to enhance captive breeding. Zoo Biol 19:333-345, 2000. (C) 2000 Wiley
-Liss, Inc.