OBJECTIVE: The vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rate is calculated wit
h a denominator equal to the number of all women who give birth after a pre
vious cesarean delivery, including those who are not candidates for a trial
of labor. We evaluated the impact of adjustment for noncandidates for a tr
ial of labor on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates.
STUDY DESIGN: All women with a previous cesarean delivery who were delivere
d during 1998 were classified as either candidates or noncandidates for a t
rial of labor. An adjusted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rate was c
alculated by eliminating noncandidates for a trial of labor from the denomi
nator. The percentage of noncandidates for a trial of labor, the vaginal bi
rth after cesarean delivery rate, and the adjusted vaginal birth after cesa
rean delivery rate were compared among 3 clinical services.
RESULTS: The maternal-fetal medicine service had a significantly higher per
centage of noncandidates for a trial of labor than did either the low-risk
resident clinic or the low-risk private service, The maternal-fetal medicin
e service had a significantly lower vaginal birth after cesarean delivery r
ate than did the private service, but this difference was no longer present
after application of an adjusted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery def
inition.
CONCLUSION: For accurate comparison of vaginal birth after cesarean deliver
y rates among providers it is essential to account for patient risk status
in the vaginal birth after cesarean delivery definition through the elimina
tion of noncandidates for a trial of labor.