Improvement in healing with aggressive edema reduction after debridement of foot infection in persons with diabetes

Citation
Dg. Armstrong et Hc. Nguyen, Improvement in healing with aggressive edema reduction after debridement of foot infection in persons with diabetes, ARCH SURG, 135(12), 2000, pp. 1405-1409
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00040010 → ACNP
Volume
135
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1405 - 1409
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-0010(200012)135:12<1405:IIHWAE>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Background: Infected foot wounds in patients with diabetes are the most com mon reason for diabetes-related hospital admission in the United States. No nhealing foot wounds are the major precipitant of lower-extremity amputatio n in the diabetic population. Hypothesis: The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in pr oportion of healing with or without use of afoot-level mechanical compressi on device. Design: Twelve-week, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: A university teaching hospital and related clinics. Patients: One hundred fifteen patients with diabetes, 74% male, with foot i nfections requiring incision and debridement. Intervention: All patients received either a functioning or placebo (nonfun ctioning) foot compression device (Kinetic Concepts Inc, San Antonio, Tex). Patients and investigators were blinded to the functionality of the device . Primary Outcome Measure: Proportion of wound healing in each group. Results: There was a significantly higher proportion of healing in the acti ve group than in the placebo group (39 [75%] of 52 patients vs 23 [51%] of 45; chi (2)=6.0; P<.02; odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-6.8). In the placebo group, there was no difference in proportion of healing bet ween those identified as compliant (<greater than or equal to>50 hours of u se per week) vs noncompliant (P=.10). In patients receiving active units, m ore patients in the compliant subgroup experienced wound healing (P<.03). W hen compared as a whole, there was a significant trend toward an increasing proportion of healing from the placebo-noncompliant to the placebo-complia nt to the active-noncompliant to the active-compliant groups (<chi>(2)(tren d)=8.3; P<.005). Conclusions: Edema reduction achieved in this study by way of a pump and wr ap system may increase the proportion of wound healing in patients after de bridement of foot infections in patients with diabetes. Furthermore, the da ta suggest a potential association between increased compliance with use of the device and an increased trend toward wound healing.