Distinctive cognate sequence discrimination, bound DNA conformation, and binding modes in the E2 C-terminal domains from prototype human and bovine papillomaviruses
Du. Ferreiro et al., Distinctive cognate sequence discrimination, bound DNA conformation, and binding modes in the E2 C-terminal domains from prototype human and bovine papillomaviruses, BIOCHEM, 39(47), 2000, pp. 14692-14701
The C-terminal DNA binding domain of the E2 protein is involved in transcri
ptional regulation and DNA replication in papillomaviruses. At low ionic st
rength, the domain has a tendency to form aggregates, a process readily rev
ersible by the addition of salt. While fluorescence anisotropy measurements
show a 1:1 stoichiometry at pH 5.5, we observed that a second HPV-16 E2 C-
terminal dimer can bind per DNA site at pH 7.0. This was confirmed by displ
acement of bis-ANS binding, tryptophan fluorescence, native electrophoresis
, and circular dichroism. The two binding events are nonequivalent, with a
high-affinity binding involving one E2C dimer per DNA molecule with a K-D o
f 0.18 +/- 0.02 nM and a lower affinity binding mode of 2.0 +/- 0.2 nM. The
bovine (BPV-1) E2 C-terminal domain binds to an HPV-16 E2 site with 350-fo
ld lower affinity than the human cognate domain and binds 7-fold less tight
ly even to a bovine-derived DNA site. The ability to discriminate between c
ognate and noncognate sequences is 50-fold higher for the human domain, and
the latter is 180-fold better than the bovine at discriminating specific f
rom nonspecific DNA. A substantial conformational change in bound DNA is ob
served by near-UV circular dichroism. The bovine domain imposes a different
DNA conformation than that caused by the human counterpart, which could be
explained by a more pronounced bent. Structure-function differences and bi
ochemical properties of the complexes depend on the protein domain rather t
han on the DNA, in line with crystallographic evidence. Despite the strong
sequence homology and overall folding topology, the differences observed ma
y explain the distinctive transcriptional regulation in bovine and human vi
ruses.