Hj. Metting et al., Comparison of migration modeling in micellar electrokinetic chromatographyby linear regression and by use of an artificial neural network, CHROMATOGR, 52(9-10), 2000, pp. 607-613
The concentrations of modifier (methanol or acetonitrile) and surfactant (s
odium dodecyl sulfate SDS) in the running buffer are important factors infl
uencing the mobility of analytes in micellar electrokinetic chromatography
(MEKC). Response surfaces of the effective mobility can be used to predict
mobility as a function of the buffer composition.
This paper describes the modeling, by multiple linear regression and by use
of a back-propagation neural network, of the response surfaces of the effe
ctive mobility of cocaine and related compounds, of fluvoxamine and its pos
sible impurities, and of a mixture of alkylphenone. Special attention has b
een paid to selection of the proper order of the regression models, to sele
ction of the proper network configuration, and to the predictive quality of
the models. The regression models were selected by backward elimination of
non-significant terms starting with a full second-order polynomial model.
The proper network configuration was selected by finding the optimum number
of hidden neurons by lateral inhibition and subsequent determination of th
e optimum number of training cycles by a cross-validation method.
On the basis of the multiple determination coefficient, R-2, the descriptiv
e performances of the neural network and the regression models are almost t
he same. However, the predictive performance of the regression models and t
he neural network models are approximately equal for migration in MEKC. The
relative prediction error of the effective mobility is ca 2.5% for cocaine
and related compounds, 1 - 7% for the alkylphenones, and 1.5 - 2.2% for fl
uvoxamine and its possible impurities; this is approximately the same order
of magnitude, or slightly higher, than the relative standard deviation of
the replicate measurements.