Long-term renoprotective effect of nisoldipine and lisinopril in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy

Citation
L. Tarnow et al., Long-term renoprotective effect of nisoldipine and lisinopril in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy, DIABET CARE, 23(12), 2000, pp. 1725-1730
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
DIABETES CARE
ISSN journal
01495992 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1725 - 1730
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-5992(200012)23:12<1725:LREONA>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
OBJECTIVE - To compare the long-term effect on kidney function of a long-ac ting calcium antagonist (nisoldipine) versus a long-acting ACE inhibitor (l isinopril) in hypertensive type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropat hy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We performed a 4-year prospective, randomized , double-dummy controlled study comparing nisoldipine (20-40 mg once a day) with lisinopril (10-20 mg once a day). The study was double-blinded for th e first year and single-blinded thereafter. The study included 51 hypertens ive type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. Three patients drop ped out during the first month; results for the remaining 48 patients are p resented. RESULTS - At baseline, the two groups were comparable: glomerular filtratio n rate (GFR) was 85 +/- 5 and 85 +/- 6 mi min(-1) [1.73 m](-2); mean 24-h a mbulatory blood pressure was 108 +/- 3 and 105 +/- 2 mmHg, and albuminuria was 1,554 mg/24 h (95% CI 980-2,465) and 1,033 mg/24 h (760-1,406) in the l isinopril and nisoldipine groups, respectively. Mean 24-h arterial blood pr essure during the study did not differ between the lisinopril and nisoldipi ne groups (100 +/- 2 and 103 +/- 1 mmHg, respectively). The time-course of albuminuria differed between groups (P < 0.001). Whereas initiation of trea tment with lisinopril resulted in a reduction from baseline albuminuria by 52% (95% CI 14-73), albuminuria in the nisoldipine group did not change thr oughout the study. GFR declined in a biphasic manner with an initial (0-6 m onths) reduction of 1.3 +/- 0.3 ml.min(-1).month(-1) in the lisinopril grou p compared with 0.2 +/- 0.4 ml.min(-1).month(-1) in the nisoldipine group ( P < 0.01). The subsequent sustained decline (6 to 48 months or the end of t reatment) was identical in the two groups: 0.5 +/- 0.1 ml.min(-1).month(-1) (NS). Two patients in the lisinopril group and three patients in the nisol dipine group entered therapy for end-stage renal failure. CONCLUSIONS - Long-term treatment with lisinopril or nisoldipine has simila r beneficial effects on progression of diabetic nephropathy in hypertensive type 1 diabetic patients.