Gtc. Ko et al., Combined use of fasting plasma glucose and HbA(1c) predicts the progression to diabetes in Chinese subjects, DIABET CARE, 23(12), 2000, pp. 1770-1773
OBJECTIVE - We have previously suggested using the paired values of fasting
fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA(1c) to identify potential diabetic su
bjects. In this article, we followed up on 208 nondiabetic subjects and exa
mined their rates of progression to diabetes. We analyzed their likelihood
of becoming diabetic according to their baseline FPG and HbA(1c) concentrat
ions.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Between 1988 and 1995, 2,877 Chinese subjects
with risk factors for diabetes underwent screening. Of these, 2,250 had FP
G <7.8 mmol/l and 2-h plasma glucose (PG) <11.1 mmol/l. Of these 2,250 subj
ects, 265 were randomly recruited for an annual oral glucose tolerance test
(OGTT) until they progressed to develop diabetes. Of those 265 subjects, 5
7 had baseline FPG greater than or equal to7.0 mmol/l and were excluded fro
m the present analysis. Hence, the progression of glucose tolerance in 208
subjects who were nondiabetic according to the new American Diabetes Associ
ation diagnostic criteria (FPG <7.0 mmol/l and 2-h PG <11.1 mmol/l) was exa
mined
RESULTS - Of the 208 nondiabetic subjects, 26 (12.5%) were men and 182 (87.
5%) were women. After a mean follow-up of 1.60 +/- 1.16 years (range 1-7, m
edian 1), 44 (21.2%) progressed to develop diabetes and 164 (78.8%) remaine
d nondiabetic. Those who were diabetic at the end of the study had a high l
ikelihood ratio (LR) of 9.3 to have baseline FPG greater than or equal to6.
1 mmol/l and baseline HbA(1c) greater than or equal to6.1%. This was compar
ed with a low LR of 0.6-1.1 in diabetic subjects who had either FPG <6.1 mm
ol/l or HbA(1c) <6.1% or both at baseline. The crude rate of progression to
diabetes was more than five times higher (44.1 vs. 8.1%) in those whose ba
seline FPG was greater than or equal to6.1 mmol/l and baseline HbA(1c) was
greater than or equal to6.1% compared with those whose baseline FPG was <6.
1 mmol/l and baseline HbA(1c) was <6.1%.
CONCLUSIONS - For Chinese subjects with risk factors for glucose intoleranc
e, the use of paired FPG and HbA(1c) values helped to identify potential di
abetic subjects. Those with an FPG greater than or equal to6.1 mmol/l and H
bA(1c) greater than or equal to6.1% had a rate of progression to diabetes m
ore than five times higher than those with an FPG <6.1 mmol/l and an HbA(1c
) <6.1% after a mean follow-up of 1.6 years. Those with an FPG greater than
or equal to6.1 but <7.0 mmol/l, especially if their HbA(1c) was <greater t
han or equal to>6.1%, should undergo an OGTT to confirm diabetes. Subjects
with an FPG <6.1 mmol/l and/or an HbA(1c) <6.1% should have regular screeni
ng using the paired values of FPG and HbA(1c).