Dr. Meeking et al., Effects of cyclo-oxygenase inhibition on vasodilatory response to acetylcholine in patients with type 1 diabetes and nondiabetic subjects, DIABET CARE, 23(12), 2000, pp. 1840-1843
OBJECTIVE - Studies examining vasodilatory responses to acetylcholine (ACh)
and its derivatives have been conflicting. Enhanced activation of the cycl
o-oxygenase pathway and increased availability of vasodilatory prostanoids
may occur in type 1 diabetes, and this may compensate for the observed redu
ction in nitric oxide (NO) activity; Mie examined the role of cyclo-oxygena
se inhibition on vasodilatory responses in 12 healthy normotensive type I d
iabetic adults and 12 nondiabetic control subjects of similar age, sex, and
BMI.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Forearm blood flow tvas measured using a Veno
us occlusion plethysmography technique at baseline and after brachial arter
y infusions of ACh (7.5, 15, and 30 mug/min). Forearm blood flow at baselin
e and after ACh was then reexamined after local intra-arterial infusion of
indomethacin (0.3 mg/100 mi forearm volume), a cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor.
RESULTS - Baseline blood flow in the diabetic and control groups were simil
ar (2.65 +/- 0.26 vs. 2.59 +/- 0.20 ml/min per 100 mi, respectively, P = 0.
4). After indomethacin infusion, the vasodilatory responses to all doses of
ACh were reduced in both the diabetic (by 25.30 +/- 4.90%) and control gro
up (by 11.23 +/- 5.45%. However, the reduction in blood flow response to AC
h after indomethacin was greater in diabetic patients compared with control
subjects (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS - Our findings suggest that vasodilatory prostanoids are import
ant in determining endothelial response to ACh in diabetic and nondiabetic
subjects. Increased prostaglandin-mediated vasodilation may compensate for
attenuated responses to NO previously reported in diabetic subjects. These
findings may partly explain the conflicting reports of endothelial dysfunct
ion in patients with type 1 diabetes.