Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index

Citation
G. Gosman-hedstrom et E. Svensson, Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index, DISABIL REH, 22(16), 2000, pp. 702-715
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation
Journal title
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
09638288 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
16
Year of publication
2000
Pages
702 - 715
Database
ISI
SICI code
0963-8288(200011)22:16<702:PROTFI>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Purpose : The aim of this study was to evaluate the concordance between the assessments of ADL according to the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Barthel ADL index (BI) by means of a rank-invariant statistical met hod. Method: The construct validity, also called parallel reliability, of FIM an d BI was assessed on the item level. Two different approaches to condensing the FIM assessments into 2-4 scale steps on the item level in order to cal ibrate the two ADL instruments were compared. One was determined by the the oretical operational definitions and the other defined by the empirical def initions. The 204 assessments of elderly persons were made three months aft er stroke by means of interviews. Results : The parallel reliability of the FIM and the BI on the item level was strong, both according to the theoretical cut-off levels defined by the operational definitions and the empirical cut-off levels defined by the ma rginal distributions. Conclusions : The concordance between FIM and BI was high. There was a slig ht difference in favour of the operational definitions. The clinical key el ements are to have a critical attitude towards ADL instruments; how they ar e constructed and operationalized. These are important elements in the qual ity assurance in the everyday work.