Process writing in the classrooms of eleven fifth-grade teachers with different orientations to teaching and learning

Citation
My. Lipson et al., Process writing in the classrooms of eleven fifth-grade teachers with different orientations to teaching and learning, ELEM SCH J, 101(2), 2000, pp. 209-231
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Education
Journal title
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
00135984 → ACNP
Volume
101
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
209 - 231
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-5984(200011)101:2<209:PWITCO>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
In this study we examined process approaches to writing in the classrooms o f 11 teachers with 4 orientations to teaching and learning. Using observati onal and interview data, student work samples, and classroom artifacts, II case composites were generated of fifth-grade teachers who used process wri ting approaches and were members of 4 belief clusters. Cross-case analysis was conducted using 6 dimensions of writing instruction. All teachers engag ed students in the recursive steps of process writing, but there was signif icant variability in other aspects of their writing programs. Epistemologic al beliefs about teaching and learning were highly predictive of the type o f writing instruction, but these were mediated by experience and context. O f the II teachers, 6 took a procedural approach to the teaching of writing, and the other 5 used a workshop approach. None of the 6 "procedural" teach ers used peer conferencing, and even teacher-directed writing conferences w ere peripheral to the writing programs of 4 of these 6 teachers. In contras t, 4 of the 5 workshop teachers used both teacher-led and peer conferences as a central part of their writing programs. These conferences were also di fferent. Whereas 5 of the 6 procedural teachers focused almost exclusively on mechanics, all 5 of the other teachers focused their conference talk on effective writing-selecting appropriate words, writing effective leads, and so on. Other aspects of the writing programs varied as well. The amount an d duration of sustained writing time, student control over ideas, and owner ship of the editorial process differed across the II classrooms.