Physical and hydrological impacts of blanket bog afforestation at Bad a' Cheo, Caithness: the first 5 years

Citation
Ar. Anderson et al., Physical and hydrological impacts of blanket bog afforestation at Bad a' Cheo, Caithness: the first 5 years, FORESTRY, 73(5), 2000, pp. 467-478
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
FORESTRY
ISSN journal
0015752X → ACNP
Volume
73
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
467 - 478
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-752X(2000)73:5<467:PAHIOB>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
This study was established to investigate the effects of blanket bug affore station on the physical properties of the peat and on the quantity and timi ng of runoff. Three afforestation treatments, representing the options for planting on very deep blanket bog, were used: Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensi s), given phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) fertilizers at planting, lodgepo le pine (Pinus contorta), given no fertilizer until P was needed to relieve deficiency in year 3, and a 50:50 mixture of the two species, given P at p lanting. Afforestation treatments reduced annual runoff by 7 per cent compa red with an unploughed, unplanted but drained control. Runoff was reduced i n spring and summer but not in autumn or winter. Compared with the drained control, peak flows were increased by afforestation while the baseflow comp onent of total flow was reduced. Sediment accumulated at a similar rate (0. 016 kg dry matter per metre of drain per year) in the afforested treatments and the drained control. Afforestation lowered the water table significant ly compared with the control, but there were no differences among the three treatments. Feat water content was reduced within 4 weeks by the ploughing operation that preceded planting in the afforestation treatments. In the f irst 5 years the undisturbed ground between plough ridges subsided by 11 (/-2) cm while the tops of ridges and the bottoms of furrows subsided by 18 (+/-2) cm and 5 (+/-1) cm, respectively. Subsidence increased with proximit y to a drain, from 9 (+/-1) cm, 10 m from the drain edge, to 16 (+/-2) cm, 0.1 m from the drain edge. Even in the control treatment, the perimeter dra in caused a subsidence of 2 (+/-1) cm 10 m away, and 11 (+/-5) cm 0.1 m fro m the edge. The rate of subsidence slowed down with time and, after the thi rd year, further subsidence only occurred in summer. Feat depth markers sho wed that subsidence of the ground surface was caused by consolidation of pe at throughout its thickness, rather than solely by shrinkage of the drained layer. Half of the subsidence near the centre of the afforested plots was caused by compression of peat at depths of over 1.5 m. Drainage system desi gn and maintenance needs to take account of the differential subsidence ben eath planted and unplanted ground. Where drains run from planted onto unpla nted ground they need to be deep enough to allow for a 0.6 degrees reductio n in gradient in the first 5 years, increasing to 1 degrees or more subsequ ently. When considering pre-commercial felling to restore peatland habitats , areas of pre-thicket age first rotation forest can be considered candidat es because, at this stage, the peat has not been altered to a degree which would hinder rewetting and consequent habitat development.