We analyse the subgame perfect equilibrium of a four-stage game in a model
of vertical product differentiation, where the consumer's evaluation of a p
roduct depends on its inherent quality and on its network's size. First, tw
o firms choose their product's inherent quality. Then they may mutually agr
ee on providing an adapter before competing in prices. Finally, consumers b
uy. We find that, despite the high quality firm's preference for incompatib
ility, an adapter is always provided in equilibrium. Social welfare is grea
ter than without an adapter and can be improved by regulating compatibility
only in those cases where qualities are differentiated too much. (C) 2001
Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.