Pa. Manning et al., Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost: The feasibility and cosmetic outcome of a fractionated outpatient delivery scheme, INT J RAD O, 48(5), 2000, pp. 1301-1306
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility, potential toxicity, and cosmetic outc
ome of fractionated interstitial high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost f
or the management of patients with breast cancer at increased risk for loca
l recurrence.
Methods and Materials: From 1994 to 1996, 18 women,vith early stage breast
cancer underwent conventionally fractionated whole breast radiotherapy (50-
50.4 Gy) followed by interstitial HDR brachytherapy boost. All were conside
red to be at high risk for local failure. Seventeen had pathologically conf
irmed final surgical margins of less than 2 mm or focally positive. Brachyt
herapy catheter placement and treatment delivery were conducted on an outpa
tient basis. Preplanning was used to determine optimal catheter positions t
o enhance dose homogeneity of dose delivery. The total HDR boost dose was 1
5 Gy delivered in 6 fractions of 2.5 Gy over 3 days. Focal control, surviva
l, late toxicities (LENT-SOMA), and cosmetic outcome were recorded in follo
w-up. In addition, factors potentially influencing cosmesis were analyzed b
y logistic regression analysis.
Results: The minimum follow-up is 40 months with a median 50 months. Sixtee
n patients were alive without disease at last follow-up. There have been no
in-breast failures observed. One patient died with brain metastases, and a
nother died of unrelated causes without evidence of disease. Grade 1-2 late
toxicities included 39% with hyperpigmentation, 56% with detectable fibros
is, 28% with occasional discomfort, and 11% with visible telangiectasias. G
rade 3 toxicity was reported in one patient as persistent discomfort. Sixty
-seven percent of patients were considered to have experienced good/excelle
nt cosmetic outcomes. Factors with a direct relationship to adverse cosmeti
c outcome were extent of surgical defect (p = 0.00001), primary excision vo
lume (p = 0.017), and total excision volume (p = 0.015).
Conclusions: For high risk patients who may benefit from increased doses, i
nterstitial HDR brachytherapy provides a convenient outpatient method for b
oosting the lumpectomy cavity following conventional whole breast irradiati
on without overdosing normal tissues. The fractionation scheme of 15 Gy in
6 fractions over 3 days is well tolerated. The volume of tissue removed fro
m the breast at lumpectomy appears to dominate cosmetic outcome in this gro
up of patients. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.