Purpose: To evaluate the dosimetric difference between a simple radiation t
herapy plan utilizing a single contour and a more complex three-dimensional
(3D) plan utilizing multiple contours, lung inhomogeneity correction, and
dose-based compensators.
Methods and Materials: This is a study of the radiation therapy (RT) plans
of 85 patients with early breast cancer. All patients were considered for b
reast-conserving management and treated by conventional tangential fields t
echnique. Two plans were generated for each patient. The first RT plan was
based on a single contour taken at the central axis and utilized two wedges
. The second RT plan was generated by using the 3D planning system to desig
n dose based compensators after lung inhomogeneity correction had been made
. The endpoints of the study were the comparison between the volumes receiv
ing greater than 105% and greater than 110% of the reference dose, as well
as the magnitude of the treated volume maximum dose. Dosimetric improvement
was defined to be of significant value if the volume receiving > 105% of o
ne plan was reduced by at least 50%,vith the absolute difference between th
e volumes being 5% or greater. The dosimetric improvements in 49 3D plans (
58%) were considered of significant value. patients' field separation and b
reast size did not predict the magnitude of improvement in dosimetry.
Conclusion: Dose-based compensator plans significantly reduced the volumes
receiving > 105%, >110%, and volume maximum dose. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science
Inc.