Automated monitoring of snow cover over North America with multispectral satellite data

Citation
P. Romanov et al., Automated monitoring of snow cover over North America with multispectral satellite data, J APPL MET, 39(11), 2000, pp. 1866-1880
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY
ISSN journal
08948763 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1866 - 1880
Database
ISI
SICI code
0894-8763(200011)39:11<1866:AMOSCO>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Current National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) operational global- and continental-scale snow cover maps are produced interactively by visual analysis of satellite imagery. This snow product is subjective, and its preparation requires a substantial daily human effort. The primary obj ective of the current study was to develop an automated system that could p rovide NOAA analysts with a first-guess snow cover map and thus to reduce t he human labor in the daily snow cover analysis. The proposed system uses a combination of observations in the visible, midinfrared, and infrared made by the Imager instrument aboard Geostationary Operational Environmental Sa tellites (GOES) and microwave observations of the Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) aboard the polar-orbiting Defense Meteorological Satellite P rogram platform. The devised technique was applied to satellite data for ma pping snow cover for the North American continent during the winter season of 1998/99. To assess the system performance, the automatically produced sn ow maps were compared with the NOAA interactive operational product and wer e validated against in situ land surface observations. Validation tests rev ealed that in 85% of cases the automated snow maps fit exactly the ground s now cover reports. Snow identification with the combination of GOES and SSM /I observations was found to be more efficient than the one based solely on satellite microwave data. Comparisons between the automated maps and the N OAA operational product have shown their good agreement in the distribution of snow covet and its area coverage. The accuracy of the automated product was found to be similar to and sometimes higher than the accuracy of the o perational snow cover maps manually produced at NOAA.