Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) initiation: models and observations

Citation
St. Wu et al., Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) initiation: models and observations, J ATMOS S-P, 62(16), 2000, pp. 1489-1498
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS
ISSN journal
13646826 → ACNP
Volume
62
Issue
16
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1489 - 1498
Database
ISI
SICI code
1364-6826(200011)62:16<1489:CME(IM>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
We use three observed coronal mass ejection (CME) events and numerical magn etohydrodynamic simulation models to illustrate three distinct CME initiati on processes: (1) streamer destabilization due to increase of currents, via increase of axial fields, of the flux-rope, (2) photospheric shear and (3) plasma flow induced CME. The 3 January 1998 event is used to illustrate th e streamer destabilization process to initiate a CME because the observed h eight-time curve indicates that the prominence eruption proceeds the CME in itiation. We interpret this CME as being initiated because of destabilizati on of the streamer due to the upward motion of the flux-rope by the additio nal Lorentz (J x B) force. On the other hand, the 22 June 1998 event shows that the CME was launched prior to the prominence eruption. This case is mo deled by shear-induced loss-of-equilibrium The last case is entirely differ ent from the previous two. The morphology of the 5 October 1996 event does not show any relation with the filament/flux-rope. We modeled this event by introducing a plasma flow. Using the observations and MHD models, we concl ude that the first two categories are flux-rope driven, because the energy source, which propels the CME, is stored in the flux-rope, and the third ca tegory is driven by an assumed plasma flow with the effects of fast solar w ind, because this CME appears at the boundary region of a streamer and coro nal hole. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.