The efficacy and safety of a new enteric-coated formulation of fluoxetine given once weekly during the continuation treatment of major depressive disorder

Citation
Me. Schmidt et al., The efficacy and safety of a new enteric-coated formulation of fluoxetine given once weekly during the continuation treatment of major depressive disorder, J CLIN PSY, 61(11), 2000, pp. 851-857
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,"Clinical Psycology & Psychiatry
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
ISSN journal
01606689 → ACNP
Volume
61
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
851 - 857
Database
ISI
SICI code
0160-6689(200011)61:11<851:TEASOA>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Background: A simple, once-weekly dosing regimen could be a convenient alte rnative for many patients during long-term treatment of depression. Such a strategy might also be effective for improving medication compliance and th e outcome of continuation treatment. The safety and effectiveness of a new formulation of enteric-coated fluoxetine (90 mg) given once weekly was test ed during the continuation treatment of major depressive disorder. Method: Patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder with modified 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) scores gr eater than or equal to 18 and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illne ss scale (CGI-S) scores greater than or equal to 4 were treated 13 weeks wi th open-label 20 mg/day of fluoxetine in a multicenter U.S. study. Responde rs (N = 501) were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg of fluoxetine daily, p lacebo, or 90 mg of enteric-coated fluoxetine weekly for 25 weeks of double -blind continuation treatment. The primary efficacy measure was the percent age of patients who relapsed. Time to relapse was tested over the 25-week c ontinuation period using log-rank analyses of the Kaplan-Meier estimates of relapse rates. Additional analyses of efficacy included comparison of chan ge from baseline to endpoint for the HAM-D-17, CGI-S, and HAM-D-28 subscale s by last observation carried forward (LOCF). Safety measures included comp arison of treatment-emergent adverse events, both spontaneous and solicited (using the Association for Methodology of Documentation in Psychiatry-Modu le 5), vital signs, and laboratory measures. Results: Relapse rates for patients assigned to fluoxetine, either 20 mg da ily or 90 mg weekly, were significantly lower than for placebo by log-rank analysis and LOCF analyses of secondary efficacy measures. Efficacy did not significantly differ between the 2 active drug groups by these measures. E nteric-coated fluoxetine at a once-weekly dose of 90 mg was well tolerated, and its safety profile was similar to that of daily 20 mg of fluoxetine. Conclusion: The formulation of enteric-coated fluoxetine taken once weekly is effective, safe, and well tolerated for continuation treatment of depres sion in patients who responded to acute treatment with 20 mg/day of fluoxet ine. Monitoring during long-term treatment fur evidence of sustained remiss ion is important regardless of dosing regimen.