Value of hepatic arterial phase CT versus lipiodol ultrafluid CT in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma

Citation
S. Colagrande et al., Value of hepatic arterial phase CT versus lipiodol ultrafluid CT in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma, J COMPUT AS, 24(6), 2000, pp. 878-883
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY
ISSN journal
03638715 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
878 - 883
Database
ISI
SICI code
0363-8715(200011/12)24:6<878:VOHAPC>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the role of hepatic arterial phase (HAP) spiral comp uted tomography (CT), as compared with iodized oil (Lipiodol ultrafluid [LU F]) CT for revealing nodular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). Methods: Twenty-four cirrhotic patients underwent two-phase HCT examination : HAP 25 seconds and portal phase 70 seconds after injection of 1.5 mL/Kg c ontrast medium. All patients also underwent hepatic angiography and intraar terial infusion of iodized oil; LUF CT was performed 3-4 weeks after infusi on. HCT images were compared with LUF CT images for detection of hepatic no dules. Results: We found no significant difference between the sensitivity of HAP CT and LUF CT for nodules >10 mm, while HAP CT was more sensitive than LUF CT in revealing nodules <10 mm (47 vs. 27, p < 0.001). Conclusions: HCT should be considered as the first method for the detection of HCC, whereas LUF CT should be used only for therapy.