Satellite-derived maps of surface UV irradiance are currently limited by th
eir poorly assessed accuracy. Here we use an extensive data set of ground-b
ased spectral measurements from two Alpine sites to examine the level of un
certainty expected in model results due to the time-limited nature of some
satellite data. When the ozone column, cloud optical depth, and aerosol opt
ical depth supplied to a radiative transfer model are fixed to a single noo
ntime value, the root-mean-square difference between calculations and measu
rements of the erythemal daily dose is about 20%. The corresponding uncerta
inty in the monthly dose is less than 5%. The modeled results also show a s
ystematic error that depends on cloud optical depth. The results suggest th
at satellite-derived maps of UV irradiance cannot be expected to produce ac
curate values of the daily dose if they rely on a single estimate of the cl
oud conditions but may be able to provide reasonable estimates of the month
ly dose.