A. Grahnen et al., A DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY COMPARING SUPPRESSION OF PLASMA-CORTISOL INDUCED BY FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE FROM DISKHALER AND BUDESONIDE FROM TURBUHALER, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 52(4), 1997, pp. 261-267
Objective: To compare the systemic potency of inhaled fluticasone prop
ionate delivered via Diskhaler(R) (FP-DH), and inhaled budesonide deli
vered via Turbuhaler(R) (BUD-TBH) over the clinically recommended dose
range using plasma cortisol suppression as a marker for systemic acti
vity. Methods: The systemic potency was examined in a dose-response st
udy in 81 healthy male volunteers. The study was of an open, randomize
d, parallel-group (four groups) design, where two treatments were give
n in crossover fashion within each group. FP-DH and BUD-TBH were given
b.i.d. for 7 days (14 doses): 100 and 100 mu g (group 1); 200 and 200
mu g (group 2); 500 and 400 mu g (group 3); 1000 and 800 mu g (group
4). There was a washout period of 7 days within each treatment group.
All doses were administered at 08:00 and 20:00 hours. Multiple plasma
cortisol samples were taken every 2 h over 24-h periods prior to rando
mization (baseline) and during steady state (i.e., the last two dosing
intervals). Cortisol suppression was determined by comparing average
plasma concentrations of cortisol before and during treatment. Dose-re
sponse curves for cortisol suppression were analyzed using multivariat
e non-linear regression (Hill modeling). Results: Multiple dosing for
7 days with FP-DH and BUD-TBH resulted in dose-dependent cortisol supp
ression by both drugs, most pronounced at the two highest dose levels.
FP-DH-induced suppression was 41% at 500 mu g and 86% at 1000 mu g b.
i.d., while that induced by BUD-TBH was 19% at 400 mu g and 47% at 800
mu g: b.i.d. Statistically significant differences were found when co
mparing the two steroids at these two dose levels. Doses producing 50%
of maximum suppression (ED50) were estimated at 833 mu g b.i.d. for B
UD-TBH and 479 mu g b.i.d. for FP-DH. This gave an estimated relative
cortisol suppression over the dose range of 1.74:1 (FP-DH:BUD-TBH). ED
50 values, estimated from cortisol concentrations at 08:00 hours (12 h
after the last dose), were 1212 mu g b.i.d. for BUD-TBH and 527 mu g
b.i.d. for FP-DH giving a relative cortisol suppression of 2.30:1 (FP-
DH:BUD-TBH). Fourteen subjects on the highest FP-DH dose and 3 at the
next highest dose had morning plasma cortisol levels below the lower r
eference limit. No subject taking budesonide, however, had morning pla
sma cortisol levels below the reference limit. Analysis of the time fo
r return to pretreatment baseline levels showed that cortisol suppress
ion, 12-24 h after the last dose, was statistically significant compar
ed with the baseline for the highest dose of FP-DH but not for any of
the BUD-TBH doses. Conclusions: The results of the present study show
that FP-DH suppresses plasma cortisol more than BUD-TBH on a equivalen
t basis with regard to both magnitude and duration.