Ac. Verhoeven et al., Validity of the MACTAR questionnaire as a functional index in a rheumatoidarthritis clinical trial, J RHEUMATOL, 27(12), 2000, pp. 2801-2809
Objectives. The McMaster Toronto Arthritis patient preference questionnaire
(MACTAR) is a functional index that measures change in impaired activities
selected by each patient in a baseline interview, and change in rheumatoid
arthritis (RA) disease activity. In addition, it contains questions on the
state of physical, social and emotional function and overall health, and t
heir relation to RA. We evaluated MACTAR's feasibility and validity (conten
t validity, construct validity, and responsiveness).
Methods. A randomized trial of combined treatment in 155 patients with earl
y RA; patients' mean age at baseline was 50 years and median disease durati
on since diagnosis was 4 months.
Results. Feasibility: MACTAR requires trained interviewers. In the trial, i
nterviews took about 15 min. In longer term followup, activities selected a
t baseline may become less relevant as the pattern of disability changes. F
ollowup from 153 patients (99%) was available. At least 5 impaired activiti
es were identified and ranked by 147 patients (95%); interviewers could fol
low 99% of these. The scoring system proved complex and required amendments
. Content validity: Although its main focus is physical function, the MACTA
R also contains generic questions; 75% of the patients named at least one i
mpaired activity from the category "mobility." Only 48% were covered by Hea
lth Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) items. Construct validity. MACTAR scores
correlate highly with other functional indices and with measures of diseas
e activity. Responsiveness: At 16 weeks the standardized response mean for
the total MACTAR score in the combined-treatment group was excellent, at 2.
2. Items that directly address change were even more responsive.
Conclusion. The MACTAR interview is a valid and highly responsive instrumen
t to assess change in functional ability of patients with early RA with act
ive disease. It provides insight into problems - mainly of physical Functio
n - that really matter to patients. For standard clinical trials and clinic
al care, feasibility of the MACTAR is limited and the simpler HAQ remains t
he instrument of choice.