Prevalence of antibodies to beta(2)-glycoprotein I in systemic lupus erythematosus and their association with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome criteria: A single center study and literature review
In. Bruce et al., Prevalence of antibodies to beta(2)-glycoprotein I in systemic lupus erythematosus and their association with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome criteria: A single center study and literature review, J RHEUMATOL, 27(12), 2000, pp. 2833-2837
Objective. To determine the prevalence of anti-beta (2)-glycoprotein I anti
bodies (anti-beta (2)-GPI) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (S
LE), and to assess their association with and predictive value for the clin
ical classification criteria of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS
). Methods. One hundred thirty-three consecutive patients with SLE were rec
ruited from 2 lupus clinics in the University of Toronto. Serum and plasma
samples were tested for IgG anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), prolonged par
tial thromboplastin time (PTT), a panel of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) assays
, and anti-beta (2)-GPI (IgG, IgM, IgA). Normal ranges for the assays were
established using 129 healthy controls. A literature review from 1992 to 20
00 was performed using beta (2)-GPI, SLE, APS, thrombosis, and recurrent pr
egnancy loss as key search words. Results. The distribution of anti-beta (2
)-GPI antibodies (of any isotype) in each group were as follows: all patien
ts with SLE. 36.8%; SLE with clinical features of APS, 40.4%; SLE without c
linical features of APS, 34.9%; and healthy controls, 3%. The positive pred
ictive values of prolonged PTT, IgG aCL, and anti-beta (2)-GPI fur at least
one clinical feature of APS in SLE were 59.3, 50.0, and 38.8%, respectivel
y. There were 27 patients with SLE who had antibodies to beta (2)-GPI bur a
normal PTT and negative aCL and LAG. Six (20.7%) of these had a history of
thrombosis and/or recurrent pregnancy loss. Twelve studies (including ours
) were identified in which patient groups were similar and the same antibod
y isotype was measured. No agreement was apparent after reviewing the liter
ature regarding an association of anti-beta (2)- GPI IgG and clinical featu
res of APS in patients with SLE. Conclusion. Antibodies to beta (2)-GPI wer
e frequently seen (35%) in our SLE population. The prevalence of anti-beta
(2)-GPI was similar in those with (19/47) and without (39/86) APS. Anti-bet
a (2)-GPI did, however, identify 6 patients with clinical features of APS w
ho were negative for aCL and prolonged PTT. Our results indicate that anti-
beta (2)-GPI may provide additional information for the diagnosis of APS in
SLE, but do not supercede other established assays. However, when we attem
pted to place our results in the context of other reports, the literature r
eview revealed that secondary diagnoses of patient groups and assay techniq
ues are too variable among different investigators to allow useful comparis
on. Thus, no conclusions could be drawn regarding anti-beta (2)-GPI and cli
nical features of secondary APS in SLE.