Jn. Nanas et al., Outcome of patients with congestive heart failure treated with standard versus high doses of enalapril: A multicenter study, J AM COL C, 36(7), 2000, pp. 2090-2095
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
OBJECTIVES We sought to prospectively and randomly compare survival with cl
inical and hemodynamic variables in patients with congestive heart failure
(CHF) treated with standard versus high doses of enalapril.
BACKGROUND Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors produce hemodynam
ic and symptomatic benefits in patients with CHF, but there is still contro
versy about the optimal dose in this clinical setting.
METHODS Two hundred and forty-eight patients with advanced CHF (age 56.3 +/
- 12 years) were randomized to receive a maximal tolerated dose of enalapri
l, up to 20 mg/day in group 1 (mean dose achieved 17.9 +/- 4.3 mg/day, n =
122) and 60 mg/day in group 2 (mean dose achieved 42 +/- 19.3 mg/day, n = 1
26).
RESULTS At enrollment, patients in group 1 were in New York Heart Associati
on (NYHA) functional class 2.6 +/- 0.7 and had a mean systolic blood pressu
re (SBP) of 117 +/- 18 mm Hg, a mean heart rate (HR) of 85 +/- 16 beats/min
and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20.0 +/- 9.8%. In group
2, patients were in NYHA class 2.6 +/- 0.7; their SEP was 118 +/- 17 mm Hg
, HR 83 +/- 15 beats/min and LVEF 18.8 +/- 8.1%. There were no significant
differences in these characteristics between the two groups of patients at
enrollment. After 12 months of follow-up, 22 (18%) of 122 patients in group
1 and 23 (18%) of 126 patients in group 2 had died (p = 0.995, with 80% po
wer of the study to detect a delta difference of 13%). The NYHA class was t
he same (1.9 +/- 0.7) in both groups; SEP was 111 +/- 16 and 111 +/- 17 mm
Hg, HR 77 +/- 12 and 79 +/- 13 beats/min and LVEF 31 +/- 19% and 30 +/- 12%
in groups 1 and 2, respectively. These differences were not statistically
significant. The study had a power of 80% to detect (p = 0.05) the followin
g changes: 13% in death rate, 0.25 units in NYHA class, 6 mm Hg in SEP, 5 b
eats/min in HR and 6% in LVEF.
CONCLUSIONS No significant differences were found in survival and clinical
and hemodynamic variables between patients receiving standard and those rec
eiving high doses of enalapril. (C) 2000 by the American College of Cardiol
ogy.