Outcome of patients with congestive heart failure treated with standard versus high doses of enalapril: A multicenter study

Citation
Jn. Nanas et al., Outcome of patients with congestive heart failure treated with standard versus high doses of enalapril: A multicenter study, J AM COL C, 36(7), 2000, pp. 2090-2095
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
ISSN journal
07351097 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2090 - 2095
Database
ISI
SICI code
0735-1097(200012)36:7<2090:OOPWCH>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to prospectively and randomly compare survival with cl inical and hemodynamic variables in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) treated with standard versus high doses of enalapril. BACKGROUND Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors produce hemodynam ic and symptomatic benefits in patients with CHF, but there is still contro versy about the optimal dose in this clinical setting. METHODS Two hundred and forty-eight patients with advanced CHF (age 56.3 +/ - 12 years) were randomized to receive a maximal tolerated dose of enalapri l, up to 20 mg/day in group 1 (mean dose achieved 17.9 +/- 4.3 mg/day, n = 122) and 60 mg/day in group 2 (mean dose achieved 42 +/- 19.3 mg/day, n = 1 26). RESULTS At enrollment, patients in group 1 were in New York Heart Associati on (NYHA) functional class 2.6 +/- 0.7 and had a mean systolic blood pressu re (SBP) of 117 +/- 18 mm Hg, a mean heart rate (HR) of 85 +/- 16 beats/min and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20.0 +/- 9.8%. In group 2, patients were in NYHA class 2.6 +/- 0.7; their SEP was 118 +/- 17 mm Hg , HR 83 +/- 15 beats/min and LVEF 18.8 +/- 8.1%. There were no significant differences in these characteristics between the two groups of patients at enrollment. After 12 months of follow-up, 22 (18%) of 122 patients in group 1 and 23 (18%) of 126 patients in group 2 had died (p = 0.995, with 80% po wer of the study to detect a delta difference of 13%). The NYHA class was t he same (1.9 +/- 0.7) in both groups; SEP was 111 +/- 16 and 111 +/- 17 mm Hg, HR 77 +/- 12 and 79 +/- 13 beats/min and LVEF 31 +/- 19% and 30 +/- 12% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. The study had a power of 80% to detect (p = 0.05) the followin g changes: 13% in death rate, 0.25 units in NYHA class, 6 mm Hg in SEP, 5 b eats/min in HR and 6% in LVEF. CONCLUSIONS No significant differences were found in survival and clinical and hemodynamic variables between patients receiving standard and those rec eiving high doses of enalapril. (C) 2000 by the American College of Cardiol ogy.