Effect of mitral valve surgery on exercise capacity, ventricular ejection fraction and neurohormonal activation in patients with severe mitral regurgitation

Citation
T. Le Tourneau et al., Effect of mitral valve surgery on exercise capacity, ventricular ejection fraction and neurohormonal activation in patients with severe mitral regurgitation, J AM COL C, 36(7), 2000, pp. 2263-2269
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
ISSN journal
07351097 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2263 - 2269
Database
ISI
SICI code
0735-1097(200012)36:7<2263:EOMVSO>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate the e ffects of surgical correction of mitral regurgitation (MR) on exercise perf ormance, cardiac function and neurohormonal activation. BACKGROUND Little is known about the effect of surgical correction of MR on functional status or on neurohormonal activation. METHODS Cardiopulmonary exercise test, radionuclide angiography and blood s amples for assessment of neurohormonal status were obtained in 40 patients with nonischemic MR before and within one year (216 +/- 80 days) after surg ery. Twenty-four patients underwent mitral valve repair (MVr), and 16 under went valve replacement (VR) with anterior chordal transection. RESULTS Despite an improvement in New York Heart Association functional cla ss, exercise performance did not change (peak oxygen consumption: 19.3 +/- 6.1 to 18.5 +/- 5.6 ml/kg/min, percentage of maximal predicted oxygen consu mption: 79.5 +/- 18.2% to 76.8 +/- 16.9%). After surgery, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) decreased (64.2 +/- 10.3% to 59.9 +/- 11.4%, p = 0.003) while right ventricular (RV) EF increased (41.4 +/- 9.6% to 44.7 /- 9.5%, p = 0.03). Left ventricular EF did not change after MVr (64.3 +/- 11.5% to 61.5 +/- 12.2%), but RVEF improved (40.4 +/- 9.2% to 46.0 +/- 10.0 %, p 0.02). In contrast, VR was associated with an impairment of LV functio n in the apicolateral area and a decrease in LVEF (64.1 +/- 8.5% to 57.4 +/ - 10.0%, p = 0.03.), whereas RVEF did not change (42.9 +/- 10.3% to 42.8 +/ - 8.6%). Moreover, there was only a slight decrease in neurohormonal activa tion after Surgery. CONCLUSIONS Despite an improvement in symptomatic status, exercise performa nce was not improved seven months after either MVr or VR for MR, and neuroh ormonal activation persisted. Compared with MVr, VR resulted in a significa nt impairment of cardiac function in this study. (C) 2000 by the American C ollege of Cardiology.