Background The LIPID study is a major trial of secondary prevention of coro
nary-heart-disease events that includes hospital admission,with unstable an
gina (as well as myocardial infarction) as a qualifying event. In this subs
tudy of LIPID, we compared subsequent cardiovascular risks and the effects
of pravastatin in patients with previous unstable angina or previous myocar
dial infarction.
Methods 3260 patients diagnosed with unstable angina and 5754 with acute my
ocardial infarction 3-36 months previously were randomly assigned 40 mg pra
vastatin daily or placebo over a mean of 6.0 years. The risk reduction of a
range of cardiovascular events was estimated by means of the hazard ratio
in Cox's proportional hazards model.
Findings Among patients assigned placebo, survival in the two diagnosis gro
ups was similar. The relative risk reduction for mortality with pravastatin
was 20.6% in the myocardial infarction group and 26.3% in the unstable ang
ina group (p=0.55). Pravastatin significantly reduced the rates of all pres
pecified coronary endpoints in the myocardial infarction group. In patients
with previous unstable angina, coronary heart disease mortality, total mor
tality, myocardial infarction, a need for coronary revascularisation, the n
umber of admissions to hospital, and the number of days in hospital were si
gnificantly lower with pravastatin. Overall, hospital admission for unstabl
e angina was the most common endpoint (24.6% of the placebo group; 22.3% of
the pravastatin group).
Interpretation Patients who have survived acute myocardial infarction or un
stable angina have a similar long-term prognosis, a high occurrence of subs
equent unstable angina, and benefit similarly from therapy with pravastatin
.