Contrasting watermass conditions during deposition of the Whitby Mudstone (Lower Jurassic) and Kimmeridge Clay (Upper Jurassic) formations, UK

Citation
G. Saelen et al., Contrasting watermass conditions during deposition of the Whitby Mudstone (Lower Jurassic) and Kimmeridge Clay (Upper Jurassic) formations, UK, PALAEOGEO P, 163(3-4), 2000, pp. 163-196
Citations number
119
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
PALAEOGEOGRAPHY PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY PALAEOECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00310182 → ACNP
Volume
163
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
163 - 196
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-0182(20001115)163:3-4<163:CWCDDO>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
The Whitby Mudstone Formation (WMF) and Kimmeridge Clay Formation (KCF) are both Jurassic organic-rich 'black shale' units containing well-preserved m arine organic matter. Despite such gross similarities they exhibit opposite trends in delta C-13(TOC) versus wt% decarbonated total organic carbon (TO C; r = -0.76 for WMF, and 0.71 for KCF); the delta C-13(TOC) versus TOC tre nd also varies geographically within both units. Only the KCF data exhibit a positive correlation between delta C-13(TOC) and delta N-15(org) (r = 0.7 6) and the presence of aryl isoprenoids (probable indicators of photic zone anoxia). Maturity differences are insufficient to explain such contrasts. Bulk and compound-specific isotopic variations in the KCF are interpreted l argely as a reflection of primary productivity during deposition, rather th an a dominantly diagenetic signal due to incorporation of sulphurised carbo hydrate. The contrasts between the formations, and the geographic variation in coeval shelf sediments, are explained by a model stressing the relative positions and stabilities of the chemocline, pycnocline, nutricline and eu photic zone, and the effect these have on productivity, CO2 recycling, and bacterial floras. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.