Parasitological indicators of onchocerciasis relevant to ivermectin control programmes in the Amazonian focus of southern Venezuela

Citation
S. Vivas-martinez et al., Parasitological indicators of onchocerciasis relevant to ivermectin control programmes in the Amazonian focus of southern Venezuela, PARASITOL, 121, 2000, pp. 527-534
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
PARASITOLOGY
ISSN journal
00311820 → ACNP
Volume
121
Year of publication
2000
Part
5
Pages
527 - 534
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-1820(200011)121:<527:PIOORT>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
In the previous paper it was concluded that those aged greater than or equa l to 15 years of both sexes could comprise the indicator group for rapid ep idemiological assessment (REA) of onchocerciasis in the Amazonian focus. Th is paper explores relationships between community microfilarial (mf) preval ence, intensity, and nodule prevalence in 20 Yanomami communities, that wou ld allow identification of REA methods in the region. The mean nodule ratio (prevalence of nodules/prevalence of mf) was 0.54 when onchocercomata in t he indicator group were considered. The Spearman correlation coefficient be tween mf and nodule prevalence was 0.686 (P = 0.001). Palpation of nodules had 92 % specificity and 32 % sensitivity when compared to skin-snipping fo r the diagnosis of onchocerciasis. The predictive value positive increased from 75 % to 81 % when the indicator group was used. A microfilarial preval ence > 75 % in this group would be indicative of hyperendemic status in the village, between 30 and 75 % of mesoendemicity, and < 30 % of hypoendemici ty. For the assessment of infection intensity, biopsies may be taken from t he iliac crest for all endemicity levels. Five of the hyperendemic villages surveyed in this work had a community microfilarial load (CMFL) greater th an 10 mf/skin snip; the remaining 5 had a CMFL between 5 and 9. These level s of infection merit high priority ivermectin treatment. In Latin America, communities at both moderate and severe risk are included in mass chemother apy programmes (i.e. when mf prevalence is over 20 %). Roughly, a nodule pr evalence in the indicator group > 10 % would suggest a community mf prevale nce > 20 % with a sensitivity of 85 % and a specificity of 71 %. A multiple linear regression model of the are-sine transformed mf prevalence in the v illage (all ages) on nodule prevalence in those aged greater than or equal to 15 years and altitude of the village explained 72 % of the variance. The model combining nodule and altitudinal information had a sensitivity of 92 % and a specificity of 71 % in comparison to an estimated mf prevalence of 21 % or more. It is suggested that the usefulness of the REA methods propo sed be assessed in other areas of the Amazonian onchocerciasis focus.