This study was undertaken in order to determine the effects of an occa
sional late night on both smokers and nonsmokers. Sixteen smokers and
16 non-smokers aged 24-45 years were enrolled onto the study. Full tes
t batteries (comprising of Critical Flicker Fusion, CFF; Choice Reacti
on Time, CRT; Sternberg Short-Term Memory Task, STM; Compensatory Trac
king Task, CTT; and Line Analogue Rating Scales, LARS) were completed
at 18.00 h, 22.00 h, 00.00 h, 02.00 h and 08.15 h in the morning. Subj
ects were put to bed at 02.30 h and awakened at 07.55 h. Smokers were
permitted to smoke freely throughout the trial period. CFF thresholds
for the smokers remained almost constant throughout the evening, whils
t those from the non-smoking control group dropped significantly from
baseline (p < 0.0001). The CRT test showed that for both RRT and TRT p
erformance remained almost constant for the non-smoking group compared
with baseline, whilst the smokers' RRT improved significantly (p < 0.
05) over time. TRT was quicker throughout for the smokers relative to
baseline, but this did not reach significance. Performance on the MRT
component was significantly quicker than baseline for the smokers at 2
2.00 h and 02.00 h. The RT element of the CTT task was impaired throug
hout the night for both groups but performance was notably better for
the smoking group. Tracking error was comparable. STM gradually improv
ed from baseline in both groups, to st greater extent in the smokers.
There was a significant effect of time from the LARS data (p < 0.001)
as both groups followed the pattern of the other with regards to subje
ctive tiredness, alertness and drowsiness. When people are required to
perform tasks in the late night and early morning smokers show no dec
rement, whilst the performance of non-smokers gets worse. (C) 1997 by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.