In the current political economic environment there is pressure to reduce a
nd reorient public agency involvement in agricultural economic research and
information services. Efforts to evaluate the effectiveness of public inve
stments and enhance sectoral coherence through exploitation of institutiona
l complementarity are constrained by weak understanding of how economic inf
ormation is produced, processed and circulated. In this paper, we locate th
e centers of analytic competence and analyze supply of agricultural economi
c advisory services through development of an information accounting framew
ork. We focus on the relative contributions of public agencies, commercial
firms, collective organizations, and informal networks in order to identify
organizational structures and institutional arrangements of coordination i
n the agricultural economy. The observed division of labor in information s
ystems reflects the heterogeneous distribution and strategic choices of act
ors with respect to internal analytic competencies. Decision makers in agri
cultural businesses are heavily dependent on the services of a diverse rang
e of intermediaries who perform information translation and customization f
unctions. These intermediaries rely heavily on largely, but not exclusively
, publicly supplied data and information inputs. This strongly linear aspec
t of agricultural economic information systems is identified as a component
subsystem within the larger and more highly interconnected system of innov
ation. The dominant role of public agencies in economic information systems
suggests that they currently perform highly valuable coordinating function
s in agriculture. While commercial and collective organizations make import
ant contributions and could be mobilized to assume broader responsibility,
there are Likely to be Limitations to substitutability based on the classic
(but still fully relevant) problem of private underinvestment in informati
on. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.