P. Murphy et M. Maynard, Framing the genetic testing issue - Discourse and cultural clashes among policy communities, SCI COMMUN, 22(2), 2000, pp. 133-153
This study examined ways in which the congressional testimony of public pol
icy factions used interpretive frames to lend advantage to their own views
of genetic testing. The authors applied semantic network analysis to four s
essions of congressional testimony. Using the cultural theory of risk, they
divided testifiers into bureaucratic, entrepreneurial, and egalitarian cul
tures. The authors then cluster-analyzed testimony of each policy camp to e
xpose word patterns that delineated each group's policy frame. Within a sha
red frame about privacy and fairness, the entrepreneurs emphasized rules fo
r appropriate access; the egalitarians, personal concerns for family and se
lf and the bureaucrats, safety through government programs.