In the field of knowledge acquisition, dissemination and utilization/impact
, few studies have examined the appropriateness of rational actor theories
as a theoretical framework. Rather the rational actor perspective has been
simply taken for granted as a relevant analytical tool for explaining the u
se of information in policymaking. This article singles out one major set o
f assumptions imbedded in rational actor theories, those dealing with infor
mation acquisition and processing in individual decisionmaking, and empiric
ally examines to what extent the assumptions are realistic. It then puts fo
rward an organizational interest and a communications perspective as altern
ative explanations for information processing in individual and organizatio
nal decisionmaking. The findings of this article show that decisionmakers'
behavior does not conform to the assumptions put forward by the rational ac
tor theorists. Instead, the organizational interest perspective is far more
promising in accounting for the actual behavior of individuals in processi
ng information in making policy decisions.